I wish I was!) Reason 1 - What’s the alternative? (And no, I’m not being paid by Apple or anything. (“You don’t need a new camera” says the photographer holding the latest most expensive camera) It’s a personal pet peeve of mine, and when I was reading these articles, it triggered me, hence the rant! Incidentally, I don’t know what it is about punditry in the photographic community but they sure love to tell people not to buy stuff. I mean obviously don’t upgrade if you don’t need to or if you have only recently bought a new computer - but if you’re in the market for a new Mac, here’s why the Mac Studio is a good option. I think it’s incredibly short sighted to tell photographers not to get the Mac Studio because old computers are “fast enough”. I have to strongly disagree with the sentiment behind these pieces. The gist of their argument is that “Lightroom is fine on an intel Mac, so don’t bother getting a new Mac“ This has been particularly prevalent in the photographic community, with some prominent pundits in articular lecturing their readers as to why they shouldn’t get the Mac Studio for photography. However, we’ve also seen the obligatory round of “You don’t need it” posts from people about why the Mac Studio is “too much computer” for many folks. Since the Mac studio was released by Apple a few weeks ago, we’ve seen lots of enthusiasm around the product from many creative professionals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |